Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Content K12 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sponsor expands proposed ban on instruction about gender identity and sexual orientation to K–12
Summary
Representative Dale Hawkins introduced RS32554 to bar instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation across K–12. Supporters said parents opposed such instruction at any grade; lawmakers sought clarified definitions and expressed concern about effects on history and science instruction. The committee introduced the RS.
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Content K12 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Dale Hawkins, R., introduced RS32554 on March 3, 2025, a measure that extends language the sponsor previously proposed for early grades to cover kindergarten through 12th grade. Hawkins said he expanded the scope after receiving parent feedback that concerns were not limited to K–3.
Hawkins characterized the subjects as "thought" rather than biological instruction. "We're not talking about biology, we're not talking about physiology, we're talking about thought, what people think about their sexual orientation," he said. He told the committee that parents told him they do not think schools should be engaging in instruction on these subjects at any age.
Committee members asked whether the RS would limit teaching historical content or the ability of biology teachers to explain biological concepts. Representative Church asked whether the bill would affect instruction about figures such as Harvey Milk; Hawkins said the RS deals with instruction to students about the subjects and that he was not aware of the specific example. Representative Mathias and others asked for clear statutory definitions of "gender identity" and "sexual orientation" in the bill language to avoid classroom confusion.
Representative Mendy moved to introduce RS32554. Representative Hart asked whether the RS would cover all classes and examples beyond health or sex education; Hawkins answered that the language would apply across courses as written. The committee approved introduction on a voice vote with one recorded nay.
Members directed sponsors to provide specific definitions and to be prepared for testimony about classroom implications at the formal hearing.
