Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administrative Rules Genetic Counselors topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate Health and Welfare Committee votes to strike section of genetic counselors’ code of ethics from adopted rules

2520791 · February 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate Health and Welfare Committee approved a pending administrative docket and voted to reject a subsection of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics that had been incorporated by reference in IDAPA rules.

The Senate Health and Welfare Committee on Feb. 3 approved a pending administrative docket and voted to reject a subsection of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics that had been incorporated by reference in IDAPA rules.

The action began when Senator Bierke moved to approve pending docket number 24-2401-2401; the committee seconded and approved the pending docket by voice vote. Senator Blaylock then moved “to reject section 2, subsection 3 of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics incorporated by reference in IDAPA 24.24.01.002.” The motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.

Committee members discussed the basis for rejecting the subsection. Senator Wintrow asked whether the motion related to earlier debate on nursing exams and diversity, equity and inclusion; the chair and other senators clarified it did not. Committee members said the subsection was part of an incorporated body of standards and contained nondiscrimination language and a “long list of people and identities” that some members found problematic. One committee member said striking the provision would not change how counseling is practiced, and that federal or House-level pushback had been involved in prior debate.

The committee corrected a clerical reference to the provision during the meeting. Senator Blaylock made a second motion clarifying the correct citation as section 2, subsection 3 of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics incorporated by reference in IDAPA 24.24.01.002; the committee approved that motion by voice vote as well. Several senators asked for the motion to be recorded, and the chair indicated a record was requested.

No public testimony was recorded on this item in the committee transcript. The committee characterized the action as a limited, targeted rejection of a portion of the incorporated code rather than repeal of the whole set of standards.

The committee moved on after the votes and adjourned later in the session.