Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Natural Resources Data topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Idaho Geologic Survey seeks permanent funding for database manager, urges preservation of exploration data
Summary
The Idaho Geologic Survey asked the Joint Finance work group for continued general‑fund support to convert a grant‑funded database manager to a permanently funded position and discussed the agency’s role collecting public geologic data and the need for a physical core repository.
Kevin Campbell presented the Idaho Geologic Survey (IGS) budget and explained IGS’s statutory role as the lead state agency for geologic and mineral data. IGS Director Claudio Berti testified about the survey’s request for continued general‑fund support for a database manager position that has been funded on grants in prior years.
Berti said IGS has 12.47 authorized FTP (with several vacancies at the time of the packet sampling) and that personnel costs account for a large share of the budget. He told the committee the database manager position historically has been grant‑funded and supported in part by Department of Lands abandoned‑mine funds; those funds provided state match enabling a 2:1 federal match for related work. Berti said that grant support is uncertain going forward and characterized the risk of losing the position: “it would be… catastrophic for the survey to lose this position.” He added the position can generate matching federal income (the position’s work helps the survey match federal grants 2 to 1).
Berti described the survey’s regular services: compiling geologic maps, maintaining public databases, operating the Idaho Seismic Network monitoring equipment and advising on mineral and water resources. He emphasized IGS’s policy that “our data is never proprietary” and said the survey makes information available to the public and to industry. The director also outlined requests from the committee for further information: cost estimates and location needs for creating a physical core and sample repository; examples of return‑on‑investment studies from other states; and documentation of grant continuity and the Department of Lands’ abandoned‑mine funds currently used as match.
Committee members asked about economic work. Berti said IGS performs geologic and resource assessment and partners with other entities for economic impact analysis; he said IGS has economic geologists focused on mineral systems but not a full economics shop to produce in‑depth economic impact studies.
Ending: IGS asked the committee to consider making the database manager funding permanent because the position underpins multiple federal grants and core agency functions; members requested follow‑up materials on grant match history, core repository costs and data‑preservation plans.
