Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rs32251 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Ag Committee introduces RS 32251 to expand alfalfa and clover seed commission
Summary
The House Agriculture Affairs Committee voted to introduce RS 32251, a growers-backed request to change the makeup and assessment cap of the alfalfa and clover seed commission, and to add a University of Idaho representative to its board.
The House Agriculture Affairs Committee on an informational vote introduced RS 32251, a proposal from alfalfa and clover seed growers to change the commission that governs their commodity assessments and research partnerships.
Representative Sean Dygert, District 23, told the committee the change came from the growers themselves and was intended to give the commission more capacity to partner on research. “They wanna take their board, from 6 to 7 members. They wanna go from 6 growers to 5 growers. They also wanna add 1 representative from the University of Idaho College of Agriculture and Life Sciences,” Dygert said as he introduced the request.
The draft would raise the commission’s assessment cap to allow additional funding for research partnerships with the University of Idaho, Dygert said. He also noted a typographical error in the statement of purpose that committee members flagged for correction.
Representative McCann moved to introduce RS 32251 "with the amendments that the good representative set." There was no recorded roll-call vote; the chair called for voice vote and the motion passed. The committee’s action at the meeting was to introduce the request for potential future consideration.
Why it matters: growers’ commodity commissions collect assessments to fund advertising, research and other shared services. RS 32251 would expand the commission’s board by one seat, reduce the number of grower seats and formally add a university representative to support research projects, and it would raise the statutory cap on assessments to permit larger research and partnership spending if later approved.
Details and next steps: committee members asked clarifying questions about the university seat and research goals during the introduction. The RS was formally introduced and will move through the usual drafting and referral process before any statutory change is considered.
