Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wind Farm Complaints topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents tell Marion County commissioners wind farm caused noise, lights and business losses; ask zoning enforcement
Summary
During public comment at the Feb. 10 Marion County Commission meeting, residents blamed nearby wind turbines for business closures, noise, blinking lights and new drainage problems, and urged the county to enforce zoning and culvert standards.
Residents told Marion County commissioners on Feb. 10 that the county’s wind farm has harmed local businesses, produced excessive noise and blinking lights, and altered drainage on nearby roads — and they urged county officials to enforce zoning rules and fix road drainage.
A resident who identified themself during the public-comment period said the county has “lost a couple more tax paying businesses, Wendy’s and Donahue Travers,” and listed other closures. The speaker called the situation “an economical, economic economical and environmental disaster that should have never happened,” and asked why the Zoning Department did not count a property owner on a landowner protest petition. “This community deserves public acknowledgment of the harm caused by the county, and meaningful actions should be taken to mitigate the damage,” the resident said.
The speaker also described ongoing nuisance concerns: “Lights. … people are fed up with the blinking light. Noise … is above the 55 decibel threshold to being compliant. Intermittent cell phones,” and raised drainage problems on an access road near what they called “Tom Tom’s House,” asking why culverts were not installed. The commenter said water did not run across the county road until the windmill went up and asked the county to “do the right thing and enforce the regulations.”
The speaker referenced a prior response from a county commissioner: “Commissioner Durst addressed that already,” and noted the county later installed a culvert “at the taxpayers' expense,” which the speaker said cost “800 or thousand dollars,” and called that expenditure “absolutely worth it.”
Why it matters: commissioners heard multiple public-facing complaints that link the county’s land-use decisions to economic and infrastructure impacts on residents. The remarks asked the commission to clarify whether zoning and public-works rules have been correctly applied and to identify remedies for noise, lighting and drainage problems.
The comment occurred during the meeting’s designated public-comment period; no formal action or vote on the wind farm, zoning enforcement or culvert repairs was recorded during the Feb. 10 session.
What was not decided or proven in the meeting: the county’s responsibility for any particular business closure, any formal finding about decibel measurements or regulatory violations, and any binding change to county zoning policy. The speaker said a neighbor would testify about drainage changes but no formal testimony or technical measurement was entered into the record during the meeting.
The commission later placed an item on a future agenda to ask Planning and Zoning to address enforcement of the wind farm conditional-use permit (CUP), requesting roughly 30–45 minutes for that discussion at a future meeting.
Ending: Commissioners did not make any formal finding or vote during the Feb. 10 meeting on wind-farm enforcement; the public-comment appeals and the request for a Planning and Zoning enforcement briefing indicate the issue will return to the commission agenda.
