Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Deal Lake Commission approves amendment requiring unanimous municipal consent for unbudgeted major capital spending
Summary
Commissioners approved Amendment 2 to the joint agreement to require written consent from all member municipalities for major capital expenditures not in the budget, and scheduled a formal resolution next month.
Get email alerts on the Governance Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Deal Lake Commission on March 20 approved language amending its joint agreement to limit major capital expenditures not included in the budget by requiring written consent from the governing bodies of all member municipalities.
Commissioners said the change targets how capital projects are funded when costs fall outside the commission's regular budget. Under the approved paragraph in Article 10 (Finances), "major capital expenditures not included in budget activities not part of state, federal or private grant must be approved with the consent in writing by the governing bodies of all member municipalities," the commission read into the record.
Why it matters: commissioners said the amendment clarifies how the commission may proceed when a proposed capital project would impose significant funding obligations on member towns. One example discussed at the meeting was a hypothetical $1 million bulkhead project in a single municipality whose shoreline shares would nonetheless allocate costs across towns.
Discussion and approval Commissioners revised language after discussing concerns about whether towns should be required to re-approve special funding when a donor or outside source provides money for a project. "...it was reasonable to change," a commissioner said of the rewrite to ensure the amendment matched the commission's intent. Commissioner Paul reviewed the revised text and described it as "clear."
The commission moved to accept the language and asked staff to prepare an official resolution for the next meeting. Commissioners voted in favor in a voice vote; the chair instructed staff to circulate the formal resolution for adoption next month and to file the amendment with member towns for signatures.
There was no recorded roll-call tally in the meeting minutes; the commission reported the motion carried by voice vote.

