Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School board adopts consent agenda, tables secondary ELA review and clarifies nondiscrimination policy language
Summary
The Ashland School Board adopted a consent agenda that included multiple policy updates, moved the finance report on the agenda and tabled the secondary English language arts curriculum review; trustees and staff clarified edits to policy AC regarding the district's designated civil rights contacts.
The Ashland School Board on May 8 adopted its consent agenda as amended, including multiple board policy updates, personnel and enrollment reports, and the approval of minutes. Trustees also agreed to table the secondary ELA curriculum review to allow more time for materials to be studied and moved the finance report later in the agenda.
Board Chair (name not specified) opened the motion to accept the agenda as amended; a trustee moved and a second followed and the motion passed by unanimous voice vote. Later in the meeting trustees took a single motion to adopt the consent agenda as amended; that motion also passed by voice vote.
Why it matters: The consent agenda bundled several policy updates and routine items; one item—secondary ELA curriculum review—was deferred so staff and trustees could complete more review before returning it for consideration. The meeting also included a first read of policy AC (nondiscrimination/civil rights), and trustees requested clearer language about how the district will identify and publish civil-rights contacts.
Trustees questioned the draft edits to AC, which replace language that the superintendent "shall designate the district civil rights coordinator" with language describing that the superintendent "shall appoint individuals to contact on issues concerning the Americans with Disabilities Act." Superintendent Joseph Hatrick and staff clarified the revision is intended to identify multiple contacts rather than to eliminate a coordinator. Hatrick said the policy's second page explicitly names the director of student services as the district civil rights coordinator and that the superintendent may designate additional contacts, including an assistant principal and the superintendent herself. Trustees asked staff to edit the draft language to read "contact regarding" instead of "contact on" to avoid ambiguity in the first paragraph.
The board did not take final action to adopt AC; the item was presented as a first read and the draft language will be adjusted and returned at a later meeting. Other items in the consent agenda were routine and included previously circulated policy updates and personnel items.
Looking ahead: Trustees will return the secondary ELA curriculum review at a date to be determined and will receive a revised draft of policy AC that clarifies how the district will publish contact information for civil-rights issues.
