Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Energy Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lawmakers introduce bill to require large energy projects to offer power to Idaho first

2989312 · February 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Levitt introduced RS 32,573, an "in-state first" energy proposal requiring energy facilities of 50 megawatts or more to obtain conditional use permits and to offer electricity first to Idaho electric suppliers at market rates; committee voted to introduce the request for further hearings.

Representative Levitt (District 25, Twin Falls) told the committee RS 32,573 would strengthen Idaho's energy security by requiring conditional use permits for facilities larger than 50 megawatts and by requiring producers to offer electricity to Idaho electric suppliers at market rates before selling out of state.

"What this is, is the in state first energy policy where this bill requires all energy facilities larger than 50 megawatts to obtain conditional use permits before construction," Levitt said, describing a bill he framed as protecting Idaho ratepayers and ensuring fairness in energy markets.

Levitt said the measure includes a sunset clause so the policy is temporary while technology and markets evolve. He emphasized the bill would not prevent companies from selling power out of state but would require that Idahoans be offered first access to the electricity at the market price "at the time of the offer." He also said the measure applies only to larger projects (50 megawatts or more) and exempts small systems such as biodigesters and small waste-to-energy systems.

Committee members sought clarification on technical details. Representative Nicholson asked whether "market price" refers to a negotiated long-term contract rate or a day-to-day spot price; Levitt said the language needs clarification and he would address it at a later hearing. Representative Scott asked whether other states have a similar policy; Levitt said he was not aware of a comparable law. Representative Deggart asked whether utilities would be obligated to purchase power; Levitt said he would gather more information to answer that question.

Representative Barbieri moved to introduce RS 32,573; the committee voted to introduce the request and the item will be scheduled for a hearing in State Affairs or the appropriate committee.