Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
JFAC accepts corrected CEC recommendation letter clarifying state employee pay actions
Summary
Legislative Services analyst Frances Lippett presented a corrected Committee on Employee Compensation (CEC) recommendation letter clarifying the committee's prior actions on state employee pay. The joint committee accepted the technical revisions by unanimous consent.
Frances Lippett, a budget and policy analyst with the Legislative Services Office, presented a corrected Committee on Employee Compensation (CEC) recommendation letter to the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee Monday.
Lippett said the corrected letter removes language that had mistakenly suggested the committee allowed flexibility for how to apply a $1.55-per-hour salary increase for state employees; the approved motion did not include that flexibility language. She also clarified that the committee’s action to recommend a 4.5% market-based increase for employees on the IT and engineering salary schedule is in addition to the $1.55-per-hour increase per full-time position (FTP).
Representative Petsky asked whether the IT and engineering market increase applied to IT and engineering staff in all agencies or only to classified staff on the state salary schedule. Lippett responded that the committee’s motion applied to employees in the IT and engineering salary schedule and likely would not include non-classified staff for constitutional officers; she noted the joint committee (JFAC) may consider whether to limit or expand that increase.
Committee action: A committee member asked for unanimous consent to accept the corrected CEC letter. With no objection, the committee approved the technical revisions by unanimous consent.
Why it matters: The corrections clarify the committee’s intent on two elements of employee compensation—removing an unintended flexibility clause and confirming that a market-based IT/engineering increase is additive to the per-FTP increase—so the budget record matches the committee’s prior motion.
Speakers and attribution: All direct quotations and attributions in this article come from Frances Lippett (Legislative Services Office), Representative Petsky, and the committee co-chair (Madam Chair Harmon). Where the transcript did not identify the member who requested unanimous consent by name, this article records that request generically as "a committee member."
