Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Savings Stabilization Funds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears status of savings accounts — budget stabilization and public education stabilization funds near statutory caps
Summary
Legislative staff described growth in the state's savings accounts, including the budget stabilization fund and the public education stabilization fund, and explained statutory caps, the temporary code suspension used previously, and how those caps affect transfer decisions.
Keith Bybee presented charts showing growth in the Budget Stabilization Fund (BSF) and the Public Education Stabilization Fund (PSIF), explaining how transfers and statutory caps have shaped the balances.
Bybee said a governor‑recommended $59 million transfer to the budget stabilization fund would raise the balance to about $939 million — the largest balance on record under current projections — and that the BSF would be near the statutory cap equal to 15% of general fund revenues if revenues match the forecast. He explained the legislature temporarily set aside the statutory cap last year to avoid automatic transfers of excess cash back to the general fund and said the committee may choose whether to continue that approach.
On the PSIF, Bybee described the fund’s role as ‘‘overdraft protection’’ for public school support: if support units exceed the budgeted amounts at year end, the fund pays the difference; conversely, a surplus can be deposited. He said the governor’s projection would move PSIF to about $293.6 million, and reminded members the PSIF has its own cap tied to public‑school support totals. Committee members noted ratings‑agency guidance that suggested larger rainy‑day targets; staff referenced earlier comments from state economists recommending a higher target range (18–22% of general fund revenues).
Why it matters: savings balances and statutory caps determine how much cash is available for one‑time spending or to smooth downturns; the committee must weigh whether to direct more cash to savings or to spend it on priorities.
Next steps: members asked staff to confirm statutory language and the mechanics for transfers and to provide any historical schedules of transfers and uses of the funds.
