Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses possible purchase of three 84-passenger buses amid fleet maintenance concerns
Summary
Board members and staff discussed an offer to acquire three 84-passenger buses now (trade-ins possible) to replace older, higher-maintenance vehicles. Staff said buses are available for immediate delivery but the board discussed timing, costs, spare ratios and route constraints before deciding later.
The Orange Board of Education held an extended discussion on Jan. 27 about replacing three aging buses that have higher maintenance costs. District staff presented an opportunity to acquire three 84-passenger buses that a local dealer (Cardinal Bus Sales) had available for immediate delivery; staff said trade-in or auction options exist for three older buses in the fleet.
District transportation staff and finance staff explained the trade-offs: immediate purchase would avoid long lead times for new buses, but would require capital outlay in the current budget cycle. Staff said the available buses are larger (84-passenger vs. the district's more-common 72-passenger units) and that some routes and residential turns could limit where an 84-passenger bus could be used. The transportation team reported that one of the newer district buses had already been test-driven on sample routes to confirm feasibility.
Board members asked for a cost comparison between buying now and waiting to purchase in the next fiscal year, and for clarification on how many spares the district actually has in active rotation. Staff said the fleet is “right-sized” for current route needs and that three vehicles in the 10–12-year-old range were costing more in maintenance and downtime. Staff noted that converting those older units for sale would require investment (an estimated figure was referenced in discussion but a precise dollar amount was not given in the meeting).
Members discussed whether to pause purchases, buy fewer vehicles now, or proceed with the dealer availability. Several members said they were inclined to delay a purchase given the recent large delivery of buses last year and current levy and cash-flow considerations; others noted the benefit of immediate availability and potentially lower price compared with ordering new buses with long lead times.
No formal motion to purchase was made during the Jan. 27 meeting. Staff said they would provide follow-up cost estimates, clarify trade-in/auction options and supply route suitability analyses so the board can make a purchase decision at a subsequent meeting.
