Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Marriage Oobergefell Memorial topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House State Affairs committee introduces memorial asking Supreme Court to revisit Obergefell decision

2377816 · January 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Idaho House State Affairs Committee voted to introduce RS31836, a memorial that argues the U.S. Supreme Court overstepped in Obergefell v. Hodges and asks the court to reconsider as a matter of federalism and state authority over marriage laws.

The House State Affairs Committee on an introductory motion put RS31836, a memorial titled “Defining Marriage,” properly before the committee and voted to introduce it for a full hearing.

Representative Heather Scott, a Republican from District 2A, told the committee the resolution asks the Supreme Court to reconsider its 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. “In 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a five-four decision … Obergefell versus Hodges,” Scott said, and the memorial “reaffirm[s] our state authority to regulate marriage.”

Scott framed the measure as a states’-rights and judicial-oversight statement. She told the committee that the memorial’s purpose is to “restore Federalism by calling for this issue to be dealt with in the states, not in our courts.” She also described the Obergefell majority as having, in her view, exceeded the Court’s constitutional authority and disrupted state decisionmaking.

Representative Skog moved to introduce RS31836 for a full hearing; the committee carried the motion by voice vote. The committee made no final policy decision on the subject at this meeting; introduction moves RS31836 to a future, more detailed hearing where members can take testimony and consider amendments.

The committee’s remarks and the motion were limited to introductory action; no vote on the substance of the memorial occurred at this session. The transcript shows the measure was introduced for further consideration and that committee procedure (time limits and amendment authority in introduction hearings) would apply at a future hearing.