Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appropriation Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legal overview: legislature’s appropriation powers and limits explained to JFAC
Summary
Legislative counsel reviewed constitutional and statutory foundations for the legislature’s appropriation authority, item‑veto limits, conditions on appropriations and JFAC’s statutory duties.
Elizabeth Bowen, legislative legal counsel with the Legislative Services Office, presented a review of the legislature’s appropriation authority, the constitutional framework and key statutes that guide how the Joint Finance‑Appropriations Committee and the legislature draft and constrain appropriation laws.
Bowen traced the authority for appropriations to the Idaho Constitution and U.S. constitutional principles, noting the legislature’s plenary power to appropriate money from the state treasury subject to constitutional limits. She cited Article 7, Section 13 of the Idaho Constitution: “money can be withdrawn from the state treasury only pursuant to an appropriation made by law,” and discussed the balanced‑budget requirement in Article 7, Section 11.
Bowen emphasized that appropriation bills carry the force of law and are subject to the constitutional single‑subject and title requirements. She explained that the governor’s item veto power applies to the dollar amount of an appropriation but does not permit the governor to strike or alter a condition attached to an appropriation; she referenced a state Supreme Court case (Santa Rosa v. Andress) that held a veto on a condition attached to an appropriation was not permissible.
Bowen reviewed Idaho Code provisions that define JFAC’s role (67‑4‑33 and related sections), the requirement that the Division of Financial Management provide position and compensation reports to the committee, and the statutory requirement that JFAC draft appropriation bills (Idaho Code 67‑35‑14). She reminded members that the appropriation structure uses account categories (personnel, operating, capital outlay, trustee/benefit payments) and that transfers across those categories are restricted absent legislative approval or board of examiners action for limited cases.
A committee member asked about the legal options available when an agency faces a midyear shortfall; Bowen described remedies including board of examiners transfers (under limits), supplemental appropriations in session, or the possibility of a special session for emergency appropriations. She stressed that conditions attached to appropriations are legally binding and that agencies must comply with those conditions.
Ending: Bowen concluded by offering to answer follow‑ups and reminding the committee that appropriation law and the committee’s drafting authority are the legal foundation for how JFAC will execute its duties this session.
