Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Flexibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee holds bill to allow public schools to reimburse parents for self‑directed learner expenses
Summary
Senate bill 1017, an amendment to Idaho's self‑directed learner statute that would let districts reimburse parents for approved expenses (capped at 65% of district funding per student), drew extended discussion and was held in committee.
Former Senator Stephen Thain presented an amendment (Senate Bill 1017) to Idaho's self‑directed learner statute that would allow parents or legal guardians of qualifying public‑school students to request reimbursement from the student's district or charter school for expenses "directly related to the right to flexible learning." Thain described the change as a tool to give districts flexibility to retain students who otherwise might leave for online or private options.
Under the amendment as presented, reimbursements would be for allowable educational expenses (textbooks, tutors, enrichment, internships, apprenticeships and similar items) and would not be direct cash payments to parents; the total reimbursement amount would be capped at 65% of the public school funding received by the district or charter school for that student. Thain emphasized the proposal is intended to keep students enrolled in public schools and to let districts negotiate allowable expenses locally.
The bill prompted extended concerns from senators representing rural districts and members worried about oversight and funding shifts. Senator Ward Engelking moved to hold Senate Bill 1017 in committee, arguing he supported local flexibility generally but was not comfortable with a reimbursement mechanism that could divert a large share of funding while the district still retained teacher and facility costs. Senator Engelking said he would "move that we hold Senate Bill 1017 in committee." The motion was seconded; the committee voted to hold the bill. The transcript records two senators recorded as voting against the hold; the motion carried.
Committee discussion touched on how self‑directed learners are identified, who remains the teacher of record, how districts would negotiate allowable expenses, and whether the cap (65%) is appropriate. Several senators and presenters said the statutory change was meant to permit negotiated, district‑level policy and not to create an unconditional voucher to parents.
No fiscal note or specific appropriation was introduced during the discussion; senators asked staff to consider implementation details and oversight if the measure returns.
