Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Adoption And Federal Grants topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate committee backs resolution supporting federal grants for adoption education, birth‑mother support

3220282 · February 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Idaho Senate Health and Welfare Committee voted to send concurrent resolution RS32271 to print after hearing that the measure would signal the Legislature's willingness to receive federal funds for adoption education and birth‑mother services if federal grant language permits.

The Idaho Senate Health and Welfare Committee on a voice vote moved RS32271, a concurrent resolution declaring legislative support for receiving federal funds to expand adoption education and birth‑mother care, to print for further action.

Senator Julie Van Orden, District 30, presented the resolution and said the measure would position Idaho to accept federal grants for adoption education, adoption awareness and expanded birth‑mother supports should federal grant language be changed to allow the state to accept those funds. Terry Markcroft, founder and executive director of the nonprofit Unplanned Good, told committee members her group is advocating nationally to increase adoption education and birth‑mother services.

Van Orden said the resolution is intended as a readiness statement: "If there's a way to change the requirements for some of these grants at a federal level, we would like to see those monies come in to Idaho if they're gonna come in to be used for grants for us to give these young moms support," she said.

Committee members asked whether federal grants could include "strings attached." Senator Zanderfeld expressed concern that federal funding often carries conditions and asked whether the sponsoring groups would vet grant language to avoid unwanted requirements. Markcroft replied the national coalition she represents intends to work with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to shape grant language so it would align with the group's goals.

Senator Wintrow said she supported parts of the proposal that fund medical, legal and counseling support for birth mothers but was uneasy about unspecified grant language and potential tradeoffs with prevention programs; she said she planned to vote no on the motion to send the resolution to print and asked to be recorded as opposed. The committee proceeded; Senator Harris moved to introduce and send RS32271 to print. The motion carried by voice vote and the chair said the measure passed; a recorded opposition was requested and noted.

The resolution does not itself change state law or create a program. According to the text read to the committee, RS32271 states the Legislature's support for receiving federal funds for adoption education, adoption awareness and the improvement and expansion of birth‑mother support and care, and is intended to signal the state's willingness to accept such funds should federal grant language permit.

The committee did not adopt any statutory language or appropriate funds. Van Orden and witnesses said any federal funding would depend on future federal rulemaking or congressional action and that the Department of Health and Welfare would be the entity to apply for and administer grants if the funds and grant terms become available.

The committee sent RS32271 to print for the legislative record; further committee or floor action would be required for any policy or funding changes.