Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Decency Statute Clarification topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rep. Jeff Cornelis introduces RS 32,353 to clarify indecent-exposure statute after Nampa bridal parade

2989159 · February 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Rep. Jeff Cornelis introduced RS 32,353 to amend Idaho law on indecent exposure following complaints about a Nampa bridal parade. He said the change would clarify what constitutes exposure in public and allow prosecution in situations that currently fall into a gap.

Representative Jeff Cornelis, District 12 of Nampa, told the House State Affairs Committee he introduced RS 32,353 after complaints about a recent bridal parade in Nampa where an attendee exposed what Cornelis described as an augmented breast.

"This bill came to me this last fall following an event, a bridal parade that was held in Nampa and there was a lot of complaints by citizens," Cornelis said. He described the RS as language that would "clean[] up" existing statute to specify types of exposure subject to misdemeanor prosecution, listing “exposes developed female breasts including the areola,” exposures of surgically or hormonally altered male chests made to appear as female breasts, and "exposes artificial breasts including the areola," among other provisions.

Cornelis told the committee the measure is not intended to stop parades but to set "guidelines on what can be acceptable in public because there's children there." He said the county prosecuting attorney had reviewed the draft and believed it was defensible and that the proposal had law-enforcement and city-council support.

Chairman Crane clarified that only the sponsoring representative may present an RS in this setting and that local officials would be allowed to testify if the RS reaches a full hearing.

No formal vote on the substance of RS 32,353 was recorded in the transcript excerpt; the committee took a separate motion later to introduce other RS items. The transcript does not record final text of the proposed statutory changes or any specific statute citation.