Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Campus Free Speech topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee prints campus free-speech bill limiting speech zones and requiring notice-before-litigation

3411964 · February 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

RS 32082, a campus free-speech measure, was introduced with an added requirement that claimants provide prior written notice and a 30-day cure period to public institutions before seeking injunctive relief; the committee printed the RS for hearing.

Representative Ehart presented RS 32082, a proposal to strengthen First Amendment protections on public university campuses by eliminating speech zones, limiting time/place restrictions in publicly accessible outdoor areas, and prohibiting colleges from requiring advanced permission for student expression in those spaces. "You don't check your constitutional amendments on college campuses," Ehart said, summarizing the bill's intent to ensure campus speech receives the same protection as in the community at large.

Ehart told the committee the RS would bar disciplinary action for lawful expression and stop universities from discriminating against student groups on the basis of religious, political or philosophical beliefs when membership or leadership is restricted by shared beliefs. She said the bill has been revised at Boise State University's request to add a procedural remedy: before pursuing relief, a claimant must provide prior written notice to the institution and allow 30 days to cure the alleged violation; if the institution fails to cure within 30 days the claimant may bring action and the 30-day cure period does not count toward statute-of-limitations calculations.

Committee members asked practical questions about the bill's application to businesses on campus and the line between on-campus and off-campus expression; Representative Mathias and others said they wanted more technical detail at a hearing. Representative Marmon moved to introduce the RS with the sponsor's amendment; the motion carried by voice vote and RS 32082 was printed for a formal hearing.