Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Lands Endowment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to require notice and county compliance for commercial uses on endowment lands
Summary
The Senate Natural Resources Committee on Thursday sent Senate Bill 10‑62 to the Senate floor with a do‑pass recommendation; the bill would require notice to county commissioners for commercial agreements on state endowment lands and require compliance with county planning and zoning.
The Senate Natural Resources Committee voted to send Senate Bill 10‑62 to the Senate floor with a do‑pass recommendation after testimony from conservation representatives and the bill sponsor about commercial activity on state endowment lands.
Senator Burton Shaw said the bill responds to conflicts in areas such as Island Park where commercial operators lease state endowment lands and local counties contend with infrastructure and regulatory impacts — septic, roads, landfill use and public services — without receiving adequate notice. The bill would require the State Land Board to provide notice to county commissioners when a commercial agreement involving endowment land in their county is executed.
The bill would also require that leases, permits and other land‑use authorizations for commercial purposes include a provision that signatories comply with applicable county planning and zoning ordinances. Finally, the bill says revenue generated from commercial agreements for commercial purposes is not exempt from public disclosure; the sponsor said that provision responds to a recent records request that was denied.
Jonathan Oppenheimer, government relations director for the Idaho Conservation League, testified in support and said the organization supports greater coordination between the state and counties and agreed local planning and zoning can apply consistent with the state land board’s constitutional duty to manage endowment lands for the beneficiaries.
Committee discussion included concerns about whether the bill could subordinate the state’s trusteeship of endowment lands to county control. Senator Cole said he was inclined to oppose on the floor because he worried the bill might place the state in subordination to counties in a way that could create future problems; other senators said they supported moving the bill to the floor to allow further consideration.
The committee voted to send SB 10‑62 to the Senate floor with a do‑pass recommendation by voice vote. The committee packet includes at least one written opposition letter from a constituent (Ken Watts) noted by the sponsor.
Senator Burton Shaw said the intent is to balance revenue generation from endowment lands with local impacts and to ensure counties receive notice and the ability to enforce applicable planning and zoning requirements.
