Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Wan Internet topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Paulding County staff announce solicitation for WAN and internet services
Summary
At a county meeting, a staff member said Paulding County issued a request for proposals for wide-area network (WAN) and internet services and described where the solicitation was posted; deadline and award details were not specified in the transcript.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Wan Internet topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A staff member told attendees at a Paulding County meeting that the county has issued a request for proposals for wide-area network (WAN) and internet services and posted the solicitation on several procurement sites.
The staff member said the solicitation was posted "on Gila PA, Postitys Website, Solicitation Portal, The Joearchal Purerment Registering and on the Universal Service administrative Cone," and described that the county would use a review and evaluation process to select a vendor. The transcript did not provide a clear submission deadline or a formal award date.
Why it matters: Procuring WAN and internet services affects the county's network connectivity and could influence how county offices, services and partner agencies access internet-dependent systems. The county's selection process and contract terms determine vendor responsibilities, costs and the schedule for implementation.
The staff member referenced evaluation and review criteria during the announcement but the transcript did not record the specific criteria, scoring method or any dollar amounts tied to the contract. A portion of the transcript includes the phrase that an evaluation process "slected Parker fiveer Net for the Award of Res Project," but the record does not show a formal award motion, final vote or a contract number.
The record provided information about where the solicitation was posted but was garbled in places; the transcript did not provide a readable deadline, bidder contact, or an official award recommendation. The meeting record also did not identify a named county official or procurement officer by full name in connection with the announcement.
Next steps were not specified in the transcript. The staff member’s remarks indicate the county expected to review proposals and evaluate them for award, but no motion, vote or formal direction to staff is recorded in the provided excerpt.

