Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Judge hears discovery fight in Clayton County shooting case; will issue written order

6417556 · October 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a hearing in Clayton County State Court, Judge Tammy Long Hayward heard extended argument on plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery from Walmart and related discovery disputes, while pro se defendant Adrian Lamar Jelks sought dismissal and default. The judge said she will review filings and issue a written order with deadlines.

Judge Tammy Long Hayward presided over a discovery hearing in Clayton County State Court's Courtroom 304 in the consolidated civil case 2024-CV-03259 involving plaintiffs Eden Teketsky and Asperon Teketsky (individually and as parents of a minor) and defendants Walmart Stores East LP, 125 Fayetteville LLC, Master Security Company LLC and Adrian Lamar Jelks.

The hearing centered on plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery from Walmart and related disputes over privilege logs, the scope and timing of document searches, personnel files and whether plaintiffs may serve additional interrogatories. Pro se defendant Adrian Lamar Jelks also presented three motions he filed: a motion to dismiss, a motion for default judgment and a motion to strike the plaintiffs' response. Judge Hayward said she would consider the motions and issue a written order.

Why it matters: the underlying case arises from a March 29, 2024, shooting in the Fayetteville Walmart store that killed former employee Antavious Holton and seriously injured 9‑year‑old Eliana Berhe. Plaintiffs allege negligent security and related claims against Walmart and vicarious liability tied to employee conduct; discovery now in dispute concerns whether Walmart has produced all relevant internal incident reports, text messages, personnel records and related communications that plaintiffs say show notice, foreseeability and failures in hiring, training or supervision.

Plaintiffs' presentation Plaintiffs' counsel Jeff Butler and Tom Gianotti summarized the facts and argued that Walmart's discovery responses have been incomplete, delayed and accompanied by boilerplate objections. Gianotti told the court that Walmart's initial discovery responses were late, a privilege log was provided only after months of delay, and that Walmart has used broad objections (attorney‑client,…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans