Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent outlines priorities for next Bethel Park strategic plan: graduate profile, personalization, special education
Summary
Superintendent Dr. Walsh previewed a proposed timeline and three focal areas for the district's next strategic plan: a portrait of a graduate, personalized learning, and a review of special education services.
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent Dr. Walsh presented a proposal on Oct. 20 to begin developing Bethel Park School District’s next strategic plan, which he described as a narrowed, three‑part focus for the next five years: a portrait of a graduate, personalized learning, and an intensified review of special education services.
Dr. Walsh told the board the district’s current balanced scorecard documents four years of progress and that the new plan should “narrow the focus” after five years of implementation. The first focal area is defining the “portrait of a graduate,” which Dr. Walsh said should identify nonacademic skills such as communication, collaboration, self-awareness and problem solving that the district intends to develop across grade levels.
The second focus is continuing efforts to personalize students’ educational journeys through program offerings and professional development for teachers. The third is a “real intense analysis” of special education programming to ensure services meet student needs.
Board members asked clarifying questions and made remarks during the presentation. One board member commented that the graduate profile should consider shifting employer expectations and emphasized communication and “basic business skills.” The superintendent said the district will return next month for direction on the process to develop the successor strategic plan and provided a timeline and proposed stakeholder-engagement milestones in a handout distributed to board members.
Because the presentation was introductory, no formal action was taken; the board will revisit the proposal at its next regular meeting to set development steps.

