Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeals court hears challenge to judgeuse of G.L. c.152 15 to apportion jury award in Ware v. Erland Construction

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Massachusetts Appeals Court on Oct. 15 considered whether a trial judge may use Chapter 152, Section 15, to allocate a $750,000 jury award and thereby compute a workers' compensation insurer's reimbursement in Ware v. Erland Construction Inc.

The Massachusetts Appeals Court on Oct. 15 heard arguments in Ware v. Erland Construction Inc., No. 24P1170, over whether a trial judge improperly used Chapter 152, Section 15, to apportion a $750,000 jury award and thereby determine how much a workerscompensation insurer could recover.

Attorney Chris Subcheck, arguing for the plaintiff-appellant John Ware, told the court that the right at issue is "one of the most fundamental rights in our judicial system is the right to a jury trial," and said the judge improperly substituted his own factual findings after the jury returned a single damages number. Subcheck urged that the judge's use of G.L. c.152 15 was procedurally inappropriate in a post-jury context because it allowed the judge to decide factual questions the jury had not been asked to decide.

Paul Valentino, counsel for Liberty Mutual (the workers'…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans