Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council affirms demolition and abatement assessments after neighborhood nuisance hearings
Summary
The council confirmed city charges tied to abatement, demolition and related work for two nuisance properties after public comment and staff reports. One owner contested the scope and cost of asbestos and demolition charges for a property in Councilmember Walters' district.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Los Angeles City Council confirmed city assessments tied to abatement, demolition and related work for nuisance properties on Tuesday following public comment and reports from the Department of Building and Safety.
What happened: The council considered item 5 (order to abate and related assessment) after an owner challenged the amount and scope of the charges. Attorney John Wilson spoke on behalf of property owner Leona Davis, arguing the costs were excessive, included duplicated fencing charges and that the owner had made repeated efforts to comply. Councilmember Walters and Building and Safety staff described a long history of repeated vandalism, open and hazardous conditions at the property and multiple prior notices and enforcement actions. Staff said a fence contractor had installed posts but the full fence could not be completed because the owner would not allow it; the assessment therefore included the cost of materials and partial contractor work. The council voted to confirm the assessment.
Item 9: The council also heard public testimony on a second nuisance assessment (item 9). The hearing record included neighbor testimony and department findings; the council voted to confirm that assessment as well.
Why it matters: Confirming abatement and demolition costs places responsibility for cleanup on property owners and establishes the amounts the city will collect as liens or assessments. Owners contested the calculations and the council heard both procedural and hardship claims.
Votes: Item 5 — assessment confirmed (vote recorded as 12 ayes). Item 9 — assessment confirmed (12 ayes recorded).
Ending: Councilmembers advised property owners and staff to work together earlier in the enforcement process to avoid repeated enforcement cycles; owner representatives asked for further review of the invoices and for staff assistance in resolving contractor performance problems.

