Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Williams Township lot reconfiguration; multiple routine approvals carried by voice vote
Summary
The commission approved a Williams Township lot-line adjustment, accepted 11 subdivision/land development plans en masse, approved several Lower Swatara map cleanups, and recorded other staff recommendations in a set of voice votes.
Get email alerts on the Planning Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Dauphin County Planning Commission took several routine actions by voice vote, including approving a Williams Township lot reconfiguration, accepting a group of 11 subdivision and land-development plans, and recommending map corrections and rezoning cleanups for Lower Swatara Township.
On Williams Township, staff recommended county approval of a small lot add-on that combines a roughly 4โ5-acre parcel with an adjacent property (resulting parcel roughly 7.5โ8.5 acres). Staff noted minor corrections needed before final signature: correct township name in the title block, identify existing easements, and submit a Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection nonbuilding waiver form if applicable. The motion to approve, subject to those conditions, was moved by Mary Gaysky and seconded by Joe Robinson and passed by voice vote.
Commissioners also voted to accept 11 subdivision and land-development plans presented in the packet, including projects in Market Street, North Front Street, West Hanover, and South Hanover. Several plans were described as office conversions or small commercial developments; no individual plan generated extended discussion.
The commission approved three Lower Swatara Township map/zoning changes separately: (1) an Industrial Park Limited map correction; (2) a map change to educational/institutional for a school-campus consolidation to reflect Middletown Area School District interests (county recommended coordination with the township solicitor to avoid spot zoning); and (3) a change from industrial to commercial-highway for a 3.5-acre corner parcel. Each motion carried by voice vote.
Votes on routine items were recorded by voice with no roll-call tallies provided in the transcript. County staff noted that some items required conditions or additional materials for final sign-off; those conditions were listed in staff memos and will be tracked until satisfied.

