Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Safety And Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community members, board discuss vo‑tech perceptions and bullying; cyber charter and special‑ed rates noted
Summary
Board members and public commenters raised concerns about vocational-technical program perceptions, student bullying and recent increases in cyber charter and special‑education costs; residents said bullying may be driving out-of-district enrollment.
Get email alerts on the Student Safety And Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board trustees and public commenters discussed concerns about perceptions of the district’s vocational-technical (vo‑tech) programs and reports that bullying is driving some students to enroll in cyber-charter schools.
A board member who attended a recent joint operating committee (JOC) meeting said some community members described vo‑tech or the district’s programs as a “last resort” for students, a characterization the board member said was a minority view but one that warranted attention. The board member urged the district to investigate instances of bullying and to gather more concrete data before making decisions tied to programing changes.
In public comment, Christina Culver of Salem Township said families have told her they moved children to cyber-charter programs because of bullying in district schools. “We are losing kids because of bullying in our schools,” Culver said, and she urged the board to seek out parents and students to understand the extent of the problem rather than waiting for them to come forward.
Administrators also reported cost pressures: the superintendent said cyber‑charter rates and special‑education costs had increased, citing special‑education increases referenced in the meeting materials and listing non‑special‑education cyber rates that had risen from $12,051 to $13,648 (figures presented to the board). The superintendent also noted two ongoing tax appeals and said the district expects to have operations funded for the next two to three months given the statewide budget timing discussed by the budget committee.
Board members emphasized the need for a careful study of vo‑tech concerns, including whether bullying is a factor and whether program messaging should change. The board did not take any immediate policy votes on vo‑tech programming or anti‑bullying procedures during the meeting.

