Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Rec topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Show Low council adopts Alternate 1 seating plan to balance capacity and building height

5896436 · October 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council approved a seating configuration that aims for approximately 4,300–4,500 capacity using telescopic seating on three sides, a design staff said reduces building height by about four feet compared with earlier plans while requiring off-site parking to cover a shortfall.

The Show Low City Council unanimously approved Alternate 1 Sept. 16 as the seating configuration for the planned Show Low Sports and Event Center. City staff and the architect presented multiple seating alternatives that trade capacity against building height, parking and concession-area needs.

Architect Chris Ford said the方案 labeled Alternate 1 provides roughly 4,300 seats in the seating bowl with 2,800 telescopic seats and additional loose seating on an upper walking path; the design team said the revised arrangement lowers the structure by about four feet compared with earlier plans. Ford said, "This 1 shows 4,300 seats, of which 2,800 are telescopic."

The design presentation outlined five alternate schemes. Staff used a baseline parking capacity of 780 spaces for the original site layout; under Alternate 1 the project would be short about 295 parking spaces and would need to identify off-site or overflow parking. The architect also told council that seating choices affect concessions space and point-of-sale needs: reductions in seating can lower required concession square footage and produce cost savings ranging from approximately $0 under the largest-scope scheme to about $3.1 million under the smallest-scope scheme.

Councilmember Adams moved to adopt Alternate 1 seating configuration; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously. Council and residents discussed tradeoffs between event types (graduations, concerts, championships) and operational requirements; the design team said they will proceed with further design refinements while accounting for parking and food-and-beverage planning.