Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fleet Equipment Purchases topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parks committee recommends purchase of forestry truck body and hoist for about $47,137

5894155 · October 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Green Bay Parks Committee voted to recommend the city buy a forestry body and hoist from Casper's Truck Equipment for $47,137, part of a bonded $182,700 project; total project cost after remaining equipment is about $149,000 and is within the bonded amount.

The Green Bay Parks Committee on Oct. 1 voted to recommend that the Common Council approve buying a forestry truck body and hoist from Casper's Truck Equipment for $47,137, a parks official said.

Parks Director said the city bonded $182,700 in 2025 to buy the truck. The chassis was purchased earlier this year for $96,767 and is already at the city's parts shop; the committee approved purchasing the rear body and hoist to complete the vehicle. The director said about $5,000 of additional items such as lighting and work equipment remain, bringing the total project cost to approximately $149,000 — “well below what we bonded for.”

The director said the city worked with the purchasing department to obtain the $47,137 quote from Casper's Truck Equipment and recommended approval. “So, this is definitely within budget and I would recommend approval,” the Parks Director said.

Committee members voted in favor of the recommendation; the committee's approval is a recommendation to the Common Council, which will consider final approval. During the meeting a committee member said the next Common Council meeting was Tuesday, Sept. 16 at 6 p.m., and another member later corrected the date to Oct. 16.

The purchase was presented as a completion of a previously bonded acquisition rather than a new appropriation. No legal or statutory citations were offered during the discussion.

The committee approved the item without recorded opposition; the Parks Department will forward the recommendation to the Common Council for final action.