Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Home Occupation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakeville narrows and clarifies home‑occupation rules after extended debate; amendment limits internal floor‑area use to 25%
Summary
Town meeting rewrote the home‑occupation definition and passed related zoning changes. After sustained public debate and a successful amendment, the council removed a 600‑square‑foot cap and replaced it with a 25% of total usable floor‑space limit for home occupations; the final zoning change passed by the required two‑thirds vote.
Town meeting adopted a series of zoning bylaw changes intended to clarify and limit home‑based businesses. The articles altered the town’s definition of “home occupation,” clarified allowed employees and usage, and established restrictions on outdoor storage and commercial vehicles.
Proponents said the changes were intended to preserve residential neighborhood character and to close gaps that had allowed commercial storage boxes and tractor‑trailer storage in yards. Opponents—primarily residents who run home‑based businesses—said portions of the proposal were too restrictive and risked preventing legitimate small‑scale businesses from operating.
A central point of contention was section 6.40.2.c, which as printed limited home‑occupation usable floor space to “no more than 600 square feet.” A resident moved and obtained a second to amend that sentence: the amendment struck the hard 600‑square‑foot cap and instead limited home occupation space to no more than 25 percent of the total usable floor space of the residence (including usable basement area). Town counsel clarified that lawful existing uses would be grandfathered if they were compliant with existing laws at the time of the zoning change; the town cannot retroactively strip lawful uses protected under state zoning statutes.
After debate the floor approved the amendment. The broader zoning articles—including the revised home occupation definition and the other related amendments—then passed by the required two‑thirds vote.
The amended bylaw now: defines home occupation more precisely; restricts nonresident employees working on the premises to a small number; specifies floor‑area limits by percentage instead of a flat square‑foot cap; and allows the zoning enforcement and permitting process to manage hours and other conditions where necessary. Town counsel and planning board representatives said the changes are intended to give clearer guidance to residents and to ease enforcement of residential vs. commercial uses.
