Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Inter Committee Coordination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Coastal resilience committee and conservation commission agree to improve coordination and early warning on CRMC applications
Summary
Members of the Coastal Resilience Committee and the Conservation Commission discussed closer coordination, sharing agendas, and a liaison system to monitor coastal regulatory (CRMC) permit applications and avoid late-stage surprises. The groups agreed to exchange meeting agendas and appoint liaisons.
The Coastal Resilience Committee and the Conservation Commission agreed to strengthen coordination, share agendas and appoint liaisons so both bodies receive earlier notice of coastal permit applications and research findings.
Judy, Chair, Coastal Resilience Committee, proposed that each body name a member who will try to attend the other’s meetings and said committee staff will share agendas. “If we all had a better heads up when there's an application coming through to CRMC, it might help us avoid some of the heavy level of, of misunderstanding and, and sort of late to the game problem solving,” Judy said.
Members discussed a recent permit application they said had proceeded through CRMC staff review without broad local visibility; the groups said earlier review and information sharing could give both advisory bodies more time to provide technical context to the council and the public.
Sue Gibbons, a member of the Conservation Commission, said the strongest overlap between the two bodies is in advocacy, education and outreach, and noted that the conservation commission’s formal review role differs from the Coastal Resilience Committee’s advisory, research and outreach focus.
Staff identified practical steps: Lisa Turner (CRMC staff name referenced in the discussion) can provide full permit packets on request, the CRMC public comment window is short (about 30 days once an application posts), and the conservation commission and CRC will ask staff to forward CRMC listings and application packets to designated liaisons.
Why it matters: Earlier cross‑committee review of CRMC and other coastal permit activity could allow committee science and technical context to inform conservation commission advisories before public notices and council hearings.
Next steps: Committees agreed to exchange agendas, name liaisons, and lead with shared topics (marsh migration, Great Salt Pond protection, and community engagement) at upcoming meetings.
