Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Hooper City Council actions on minutes and cemetery fee update
Summary
The Hooper City Council approved minutes, directed a reexamination of an earlier meeting's minutes and adopted resolution 2025-05 updating city fees to add a $50 perpetual cemetery care fee for residents and nonresidents.
At its Sept. 25 meeting, the Hooper City Council recorded several formal actions, including approval of recent meeting minutes, approval of a fee update resolution that adds a perpetual cemetery care fee and a motion to reexamine minutes from Aug. 7. The council also adjourned the meeting by unanimous motion.
Key votes
- Motion to reexamine Aug. 7, 2025 minutes (related to Terra Strada discussion): Mover — Council member Hill; Second — Council member Maragone. Outcome: Approved (voice/ayes recorded). Deputy City Recorder Jamie was directed to review the recording and return recommended corrections.
- Approval of minutes dated Aug. 21, 2025: Mover — Council member Hill; Second — Council member Wilcox. Outcome: Motion carried (voice vote recorded as "Aye").
- Approval of minutes dated Sept. 18, 2025: Mover — Council member Northrop; Second — Council member Hill. Outcome: Motion carried (voice vote recorded as "Aye").
- Resolution 2025-05, City fee updates (includes a $50 perpetual cemetery care fee for residents and nonresidents): Mover — Council member Hill; Second — Council member Maragone. Roll-call recorded votes: Council member Ryan Wilcox — Aye; Council member Maragone — Aye; Council member Northrop — Aye; Council member Hill — Aye; Council member Fowers — Aye. Outcome: Adopted.
- Motion to adjourn: Mover — Council member Maragone; Second — Council member Fowers. Outcome: Approved; meeting adjourned.
The resolution's fee change was described by staff as adding a $50 perpetual care fee to cemetery lot purchases for both residents and nonresidents and was included in the motion that passed. The council did not vote on any ordinance related to Terra Strada because the developer had withdrawn the application before the meeting.
