Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment Immigration Privacy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Silverton resident urges county to protect immigrant privacy amid lawsuit concerns

5882494 · October 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Oct. 1 Marion County Board of Commissioners meeting, a Silverton resident criticized a county lawsuit she said could undermine Oregon’s sanctuary protections and discourage crime reporting by immigrants.

A Silverton resident told the Marion County Board of Commissioners on Oct. 1 that a county lawsuit could weaken Oregon’s sanctuary protections and make immigrant victims less likely to report crimes.

Haley Polly, who identified herself as living in Silverton, told the board she had “read the lawsuit” and remained concerned about the county’s action. “You need a warrant to release that information,” Polly said. “If ICE comes knocking, if they have a warrant, then turn over the information. If not, then not.”

Polly said her concern stems in part from genealogical research; she described an ancestor who served time and later regained citizenship. She said that past example illustrated the value of rehabilitation and argued that the county’s lawsuit, “whether it was intentional or not, it has the effect of possibly weakening Oregon’s sanctuary law.” Polly said such weakening could deter victims from reporting crimes: “So women can report crimes against their husband if they've been beaten up and they don't have to be afraid of being deported and being separated from their children.”

The remarks were delivered during the meeting’s public comment period. The transcript does not record any immediate responses or formal action by the board in response to Polly’s comments.

The transcript references “Oregon’s sanctuary law” but does not specify a statute number or provide legal analysis of the county’s lawsuit. The board did not vote or issue a statement on the topic during this session.

The board continued its agenda after public comment, taking up proclamations and business items.