Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Council topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Humble ISD trustees discuss library council structure under SB 13; administration to draft application
Summary
Trustees reviewed Board Policy EFB and Senate Bill 13 requirements for a 14-member library council, agreed to an application process and asked administration to return policy edits at a future meeting so a council can be formed to hear book challenges.
Humble Independent School District trustees on Thursday discussed how to form a 14-member library council created under Senate Bill 13 and directed administration to draft a uniform application and recommended policy edits.
The council, as framed in the district’s draft Board Policy EFB, must have a majority of non-employee parents. Staff member Mister Binkley told trustees the law allows the board to appoint additional community or employee members, but a majority of voting members must be non-employee parents — with a 14-member council that means at least eight parents.
That requirement matters because Senate Bill 13 assigns library-challenge hearings to the council once the district elects to establish one. "The council makes recommendations. Any final decisions regarding library books … is made by the board," Mister Binkley said, adding that the board must ensure the membership requirement is met when appointments are made.
Why it matters: the council will hear challenges to library materials. Administration said it cannot complete at least one active challenge until a council is in place, and district staff have kept a challenged title out of circulation pending the council process.
Trustees discussed practical steps to ensure the required parent majority and to give residents a transparent way to apply. Trustee Scarfel supported opening appointments to community residents who live inside the district, saying, "If they are interested, that they send an email to … Missus Martin" so trustees could review applicants. Trustee Grabowski suggested an application and initial vetting criteria to create uniformity across trustees’ appointments. Trustee Parker asked for a short, consistent application so candidates know whether they qualify.
Trustee Silva said he has received many inquiries and supported an application process; trustees suggested posting the application on the board website or using an online form that would feed to a shared spreadsheet for trustees to review. Several trustees suggested appointing a small ad hoc group or a liaison to help vet and manage the initial applicant pool so the full board would not be overwhelmed by volume.
Administrators said a 14-member council was manageable for district staff and that librarians had delayed some purchases until membership and process are in place. "The sooner we can get them [the council] formed and get them acclimated, we're happy to do that," Doctor Lee said.
Trustees voiced a schedule preference: administration will prepare application language and suggested policy edits for the board to consider at the Oct. 21 meeting, with a target of appointing a council by November. Trustees also discussed options for how appointments are finalized — whether trustees submit nominees individually for administrative tally or the board considers and approves appointees as a group at a meeting.
No formal vote was taken on changes to Board Policy EFB at the meeting; trustees left the guidance with administration and asked for a draft application and policy option to return to the board.
The board asked administration to release the application publicly so residents may begin applying before the November meeting and to return recommended policy language for consideration in October. The district noted that, while libraries contain existing collections, some purchases have been on hold pending council formation.
