Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners reduce proposed density for Jonesboro Road development, approve R‑3 zoning with staged permit conditions
Summary
After a public hearing and neighborhood opposition centered on traffic and school capacity, the board denied the applicant’s requested R‑5 zoning and approved R‑3 with amended conditions including right‑of‑way dedication and phased permit release tied to road improvements.
Henry County commissioners on Oct. 21 voted to deny a developer’s requested rezoning from RA to R‑5 for a proposed subdivision on Jonesboro Road and instead approved R‑3 zoning with amended conditions, citing concerns about corridor density, traffic and school capacity.
The applicant sought to rezone roughly 108.49 acres at 3707 Jonesboro Road for a single‑family subdivision advertised at up to 204 lots (R‑5). Staff noted the site’s Future Land Use designation allows up to 4 dwelling units per acre and recommended approval with conditions; the Zoning Advisory Board had earlier recommended denial. Speakers from nearby neighborhoods raised concerns about traffic congestion on Jonesboro Road, emergency‑response remoteness, school overcrowding and the cumulative effect of multiple nearby projects.
Several changes were adopted during deliberations: commissioners required a 70‑foot buffer from Long/ Jonesboro Road, a right‑of‑way dedication of 140 feet to centerline for future widening, phasing conditions that limit permit issuance until specified dates tied to SPLOST roadwork (no more than 25% of permits issued before Jan. 1, 2028, with remaining permit issuance constrained through 2030), and a cap on rentals (no more than 5% of units rented). Board members also agreed to limit vinyl siding uses to dormers and shutters and added a community‑garden amenity to the plan. The developer agreed to provide a lakeside amenity area and a mix of lot sizes with an average lot size targeted at about 12,000 square feet.
Why it matters: the board explicitly weighed countywide corridor concerns and cumulative impacts rather than approving the higher density sought by the applicant. The decision ties development pace to future roadway improvements and imposes design and rental limitations intended to align the project with surrounding neighborhoods.
Board action: After public testimony and staff presentations, a motion to deny R‑5 and approve R‑3 with the amended conditions passed on a voice vote; specific roll‑call tallies were not recorded in the public transcript. Staff will finalize the development agreement and ensure conditions (right‑of‑way dedication, buffer, phasing limits, and design standards) are reflected in the permitting record.
