Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Fox Canyon GMA moves consent agenda, removes item 14, approves PAC and TAC responses

6010946 · October 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the meeting the board approved the consent agenda, voted to remove agenda item 14 to allow further stakeholder work, and unanimously approved Watermaster response reports to both the PAC recommendation on Calleguas in‑lieu purchases and the TAC recommendation on modeling results.

The Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency board took several procedural and substantive votes during the meeting.

- Consent agenda: The board moved and approved the consent agenda (items 9 through 12 inclusive) by voice vote.

- Item 14: The board voted to remove agenda item 14 from the calendar to allow staff and interested parties additional time to address constituent concerns and collaborate with stakeholders; a roll‑call “Aye” vote was recorded for directors present.

- Item 17 (PAC response on Calleguas in‑lieu purchase): The board moved, seconded and unanimously approved a motion to receive and file the presentation and approve the Watermaster response report to the Policy Advisory Committee recommendation on purchasing imported water from Calleguas Municipal Water District for basin replenishment. Staff will seek clarifications on charges, timing and assessment treatment and return with recommendations.

- Item 18 (TAC response on Basin Optimization Yield Study modeling): The board moved, seconded and unanimously approved a motion to receive and file the presentation and approve the Watermaster response report to the Technical Advisory Committee recommendation report on numerical modeling results. Staff will continue iterative modeling and monitoring and report back as data warrant.

Following the business, the board recessed into closed session; no final action was anticipated in closed session at the time of recess.

Votes reflected in the meeting record were taken by voice or roll call and recorded as carried; specific mover/second names were not always provided in the transcript record.