Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Allocation Transfers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fox Canyon staff: allocation transfer requests must follow end-of-water‑year reporting; board urges public outreach
Summary
Agency staff told the board allocation-transfer requests should be initiated after end‑of‑water‑year reporting because required data for carryover is available only after September 30; board members called for improved outreach and educational materials to help users meet state and court deadlines.
Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency staff said transfer requests for extraction allocations should generally be initiated after the end of the water year because the agency does not have reliable carryover data until extraction-and-use reports are returned and analyzed.
Agency staff told the board that extraction-and-use reporting is collected after the water year ends on Sept. 30, and the agency sends out the reporting requests on Oct. 1. Staff said the data must be analyzed and compiled so the annual report can be produced in time to meet deadlines imposed by the California Department of Water Resources and the court, both of which require the annual report by April 1.
The timing matters because users who seek allocation transfers often do not know—until they complete end-of-year reporting—whether they have carryover available to transfer. Board members and staff warned that extending the reporting deadline would leave too little time to analyze data and include it in the annual report, creating a “time crunch” for statutory and court-mandated deadlines.
Board members asked staff to pursue better outreach to users so they understand the timeline and can prepare. Chair West and other directors suggested producing slides, short videos or a mailed notice that explain the calendar, why the deadlines exist, and steps users should take when preparing end-of-year reports. One director urged staff to “address it from an education standpoint” so operators know when transfers are possible and how the schedule relates to state and court requirements.
Public commenters also urged the agency to develop a simple, fast administrative accounting process for allocation transfers so operators can move quickly if a well fails or an alternative supply becomes temporarily unavailable.
Staff said the agency will explore outreach materials and process improvements but reiterated that statutory and court deadlines constrain how far the reporting window can be shifted without jeopardizing the April 1 filings.
Looking ahead, the board did not adopt new rules at the meeting; staff signaled it will develop educational materials and consider administrative fixes, while maintaining the existing reporting and annual-reporting schedule to meet Department of Water Resources and court deadlines.
