Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Interscholastic Athletics Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates allowing out-of-district students to join Mentor hockey team under new state rule
Summary
A proposed Neola policy implementing a state provision that would let students who live outside the district play on Mentor’s ice-hockey team prompted board questions about playing time, costs and future implications for other sports; board members signaled limited support and administrators said they will pull the item for more study.
The Mentor Exempted Village Board of Education discussed a first reading of a policy tied to House Bill 96 that would permit students who live outside the district, but within 20 miles, to join the Mentor ice-hockey team if the district opts in.
Administrators said the state budget language allows a superintendent-level agreement to admit eligible students from nearby districts. “We do not currently provide individual player equipment… the uniforms are purchased on a 5- to 6-year rotation,” an administrator said, adding that transportation and ice time costs are currently paid by the district. The presenter added that “right now there’s only one student that has requested to play for our team here in Mentor” and that the financial impact for one athlete would be minimal.
Board members raised concerns that admitting nonresident students could reduce playing time for Mentor students, add unfunded costs and open the door to other sports inviting outside players. “My concern would be if there were enough students who were coming from outside the district that some of our players wouldn’t have as much playing time,” one board member said. Another asked whether the policy would lead neighboring districts to send athletes in sports that are expensive for those districts to start.
Administrators said the policy affects relatively few districts in Ohio and noted Mentor is the only public district in the county with an ice-hockey team. A number of board members indicated they were uncomfortable writing policy to accommodate a single student. “I personally wouldn’t write a policy for one student,” a board member said. The presenter said the item would be pulled from the agenda for now and more financial and operational details would be gathered before a second reading.
No final policy vote occurred at the meeting. The board requested additional cost estimates, clarification about priority for resident students and an analysis of whether the policy could be limited to hockey versus creating precedent for other sports.
Administrators said they will provide further information before the November second reading, including cost implications for travel, ice time, and whether the district could lawfully prioritize resident students.
