Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Finance committee reviews 2026–27 budget timeline and draft committee charter; members ask for revisions

6432963 · October 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members reviewed a draft timeline for the 2026–27 budget—flagging the Act 1 index of 3.5%—and discussed a draft finance‑committee charter; members requested edits to committee scope and language clarifying when items should be routed to education or policy committees.

The Upper Dublin School District Finance Committee on Sept. 17 reviewed a draft budget timeline for 2026–27 and a draft finance‑committee charter and asked staff to incorporate member feedback before the next meeting.

Budget timeline: staff presented an initial timeline for 2026–27, noting the certified Act 1 index for next year is 3.5% and that the district will present preliminary budget assumptions in October and begin more detailed preliminary budget discussions in November. Staff said the state’s full Act 1 timeline had not been posted by Sept. 1 (a common occurrence) and that committee dates and board meeting scheduling will be finalized after the organizational meeting in December.

Charter draft: the committee reviewed a draft charter that enumerated the finance committee’s purpose—budget development and oversight, fiscal oversight of revenues and expenditures, long‑range planning, capital planning and contract review. Several members asked for edits: one asked for language to clarify that some education‑centric purchases and contracts should first be considered by the education committee (then come to finance for financial review), another proposed removing language that the committee would “ensure” legal compliance (noting legal compliance is the district’s responsibility supported by solicitor review), and members suggested adding language that the committee represents community priorities.

Why it matters: timing and clear committee scope guide when and where the board examines contracts, technology, curriculum purchases and budget exceptions. Committee members asked staff to circulate a revised charter and noted that items that straddle committee jurisdictions could pass through two committees (education then finance) before legislative action.

The committee will revisit the charter draft and timeline at its October meeting after staff incorporate suggested edits.