Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voucher Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances resolution asking city to place voucher dollars on tax bills; motion sent to full board
Summary
On Oct. 7 the Finance and Facilities Committee voted to forward a proposed resolution asking the City to display the district's voucher dollar amount on property tax bills. Board member Chris Abel presented the draft; staff projected vouchers at about $5.1 million, roughly 20% of the district levy.
The Manitowoc School District Finance and Facilities Committee on Oct. 7 voted to forward a proposed transparency resolution to the full Board asking the City of Manitowoc to place the district’s estimated voucher amount on local property tax bills.
Board member Chris Abel presented a draft resolution that would request the city include the district’s voucher total on taxpayers’ bills so residents can see a single annual dollar amount for vouchers. Abel said the draft draws on language used by several other Wisconsin districts and that the district could present two prior years of voucher figures so taxpayers can see trends.
Why it matters: staff estimated voucher payments at roughly $5.1 million for the coming year and noted that vocational/special‑ed/charter-related mandated expenditures for vouchers and related categories are among the state‑mandated amounts the district must collect and remit. Nathan (staff member, business office) said vouchers alone represent about 5% of the district’s total budget and roughly 18–20% of the levy in the most recent reporting year. Committee members and staff framed the proposal as a transparency measure intended to help taxpayers understand tax-bill drivers.
Process and next steps
Abel explained the likely sequence: if the full Board approves the resolution, the district will present it to the City of Manitowoc and request that the city include the wording on tax bills; the city must then coordinate with the state to approve the phrasing for the tax statement. Abel noted some Wisconsin municipalities, including Green Bay, have taken similar steps after local debate.
Committee action
A motion to forward the resolution to the full Board for discussion and vote was made, seconded and approved by voice vote. One committee member opposed, saying the resolution needed more discussion and fleshing out before city presentation. Committee members directed Abel to refine the language and work with Nathan on the exact figures for the full-board packet.
Ending
The resolution will be scheduled for the full-board meeting on Oct. 14 for formal consideration. If approved by the board, the district will present the request to the city for inclusion on the tax bill.
