Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Tennessee high court weighs effect of State v. Green on Rule 37 certified questions
Summary
At oral argument in State of Tennessee v. Torian Chantal Bishop, defense and the Attorney General disputed whether a certified question limited “exclusively” to the smell of marijuana remains dispositive after this court’s decision in State v. Green and whether the Rule 37 procedure needs procedural reform.
The Tennessee Supreme Court heard argument Oct. 25 in State of Tennessee v. Torian Chantal Bishop over whether an agreed certified question that asks whether probable cause existed “based exclusively on the allegedly plain smell of marijuana” remains dispositive in light of this court’s decision in State v. Green, and whether changes to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 37 are warranted.
Appellate Division attorney Jessica Butler, arguing for Bishop, told the court, “We are asking the court to answer 2 questions today,” and urged the justices to hold that the certified question remains dispositive because the trial court’s factual finding was that the officer relied only on the odor. Butler argued that Green reaffirmed a totality-of-the-circumstances test but did not change the law, and that here “the totality of the relevant circumstances is the smell.” She asked the court either to treat the question as dispositive and remand for reconsideration by the Court of Criminal Appeals or, if the court adopts procedural changes, to adopt them in Bishop’s favor, including permitting withdrawal of a guilty plea…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

