Syosset Central School District board meets in brief special session; consultant-services resolution on agenda

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Syosset Central School District Board of Education convened a short special meeting to consider a resolution to approve consultant services. The transcript records the motions and seconds but does not specify the consultant, contract terms, or vote tallies.

The Syosset Central School District Board of Education convened a brief special meeting to consider a resolution to approve consultant services. The transcript of the meeting records motions to open the special session, to approve consultant services, and to adjourn, but does not record the consultant's name, contract terms, or the vote tallies.

Board member Mr. Bartolo moved to open the special meeting; the motion was seconded by Ms. Koshia (the transcript contains a variant spelling, “Koshera,” in a later line). The board then took up a single business item, described in the transcript as "a resolution to approve the consultant services," with the motion recorded as moved by the participant whose name is transcribed as "Koshera" and seconded by Mr. Ginsburg. The transcript shows the presiding voice calling for a vote—"All in favor? Opposed? Any abstentions?"—but does not record individual or aggregate vote counts.

After the business item, Mr. Wartolo moved to adjourn; Ms. Falcov seconded the motion. The presiding voice again called for a vote; the transcript does not include a roll-call or a tally. At the close of the recording a speaker noted that Dr. Rogers was participating by videoconference but not physically present.

The transcript does not include the consultant's name, the scope of services, any fiscal amounts, or contract term length. Because those details are not in the record provided, the board's specific authority for the engagement (for example, a contract number or purchasing threshold justification) is not shown in the transcript.

The meeting as recorded was short and procedural: motions were made and seconded and votes were called but the transcript does not capture the vote results or the substantive terms of the consultant engagement. The district or board office would need to provide the official minutes or the contract documentation for details on the consultant services and the formal vote results.