Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Greenbelt Project Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Greenbelt Advisory Board approves multiple conservation projects, defers one large tract
Summary
The advisory board approved several conservation easements and fee‑simple acquisitions across Charleston County, including projects on Edisto Island, Johns Island and Ravenel, and deferred one large tract pending additional detail on subdivision and agricultural use.
Get email alerts on the Greenbelt Project Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Charleston County Greenbelt Advisory Board voted to approve multiple projects in its most recent meeting and deferred one larger proposal pending additional survey and subdivision detail.
Approvals at a glance: The board approved the following applications, each after staff presentations and subcommittee recommendations: Montgomery Tract (Lowcountry Land Trust; conservation easement); a Rutledge Road/Rutledge/Highway 17‑frontage conservation easement (Lowcountry Land Trust; name described in presentation); Palmetto Terrace Park (Town of Ravenel; fee‑simple reimbursement and improvements for a 23.9‑acre park parcel); Betsy Carson Nature Trail Phase 5 (Kiowa Island Natural Habitat Conservancy; purchase and minor improvements with a special condition for verified match); Edisto Island Museum conservation easement (Edisto Island Open Land Trust); Small Springs Scenic Buffer (Edisto Island Open Land Trust); Maxey Farm Nature Preserve (Edisto Island Open Land Trust; includes both public access and agricultural lease components); Cedar Hall Scenic Buffer (Edisto Island Open Land Trust); and Preacher's Pond Conservation Property (Edisto Island Open Land Trust).
Deferred project: The board voted to defer a larger open‑land proposal (the applicant described subdivision options, wetlands delineations and possible agricultural areas, and the advisory board asked for a clarified site plan identifying which acres are suitable for agriculture and where subdivisions would be located). Staff said the applicant expects more precise survey and appraisal work by mid‑November and the board agreed to reconvene the subcommittee and consider the item at the earliest feasible meeting once that information is provided.
Funding and conditions: Several approvals included staff recommendations for rural Greenbelt funding and match requirements. A subset of projects noted pending State Conservation Bank applications or awards as part of their match; staff said two State Conservation Bank applications have been deferred to the next cycle due to a lack of state funding in the current cycle. The board also approved a special condition for the Betsy Carson Nature Trail improvements that ties minor‑improvement funds to verified dollar‑for‑dollar match pledges.
Procedure and votes: For each item the board followed its standard procedure: staff presentation, subcommittee recommendation, public questions, a motion, a second and a voice vote. The meeting record shows motions and seconds for each item and unanimous "aye" voice votes recorded in the transcript for the approvals; the larger tract was deferred following a motion to defer and a second.
What the board asked for: For the deferred project, the board specifically requested an updated survey delineating wetlands and identifying acres feasible for agriculture, an updated appraisal reflecting wetland acreage, and the subcommittee's expedited re‑review so the full board can consider the item again as soon as the materials are available.

