Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Huerfano County hearing on Delta Solar permit draws questions on wetlands, roads, fire safety and decommissioning

6441073 · October 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Delta Solar Energy sought a 10-41 permit to build a roughly 150 MW AC (≈195 MW DC) solar facility with a 75 MW battery on about 1,000 acres north of Walsenburg; county staff recommended conditions and the hearing was continued to Nov. 13 for additional notice and follow-up.

Huerfano County officials and the county planning commission, sitting jointly as a permit review panel, heard a public hearing on Delta Solar Energy’s application for a 10-41 permit (LU 25007) to build a utility-scale solar farm and battery energy storage facility on privately owned land north-northeast of Walsenburg.

The applicant’s representative, Dale Harris, told the panel the project would be sited on “a little over a thousand acres,” interconnect to a 230 kV Tri-State transmission line and would be “a 150 megawatts AC, approximately 195 megawatts DC with about a 75 megawatt size battery storage facility.” He estimated the project’s capital cost at about $259 million and said the company’s estimate of lifetime county tax revenue is roughly $20,500,000. Harris said construction would likely begin in 2028 if interconnection and offtake are secured, with a commercial operation date in 2029, and that peak construction employment would be about “200 to 250 jobs” while long‑term operations would be “around 2 to 5” positions.

County staff lawyer Skye summarized the county’s review role and criteria for a 10-41 permit, noting the code requires the board to determine whether “all relevant environmental impacts have been considered and mitigated,” whether the proposal “demonstrates sufficient benefit to Huerfano County,” and whether sufficient information has been provided. Skye recommended a set of conditions, including a noxious‑weed management plan reviewed with Colorado Parks…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans