Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Data And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lee County launches monthly accountability updates; early reading and math risk flags highlight work ahead
Summary
District leaders began a monthly accountability briefing, showing early-year assessments and tiering from the Branching Minds platform: presenters said about 44% of students flagged in early reading tiers and about 52% flagged for math risk measures; district rolled out intervention plans and increased classroom walkthroughs and PLC attendance.
At the start of what the district called a monthly accountability update, Dr. Natalie Kelly (presenting the update) told the board Lee County Schools has begun using a data repository and MTSS tool (Branching Minds) to triage early‑year risk and intervention planning.
Kelly said the district has created banks of common formative assessments in reading and math to supplement state check‑ins; the system is being used to triangulate data from state check‑ins, progress‑monitoring measures such as DIBELS and local assessments.
Early numbers presented to the board included the district’s initial tiering: Kelly said roughly 44% of students fell into reading tiers that indicate risk (Tier 2 and Tier 3 categories in the Branching Minds presentation) and about 52% were flagged in math risk tiers. She framed those percentages as early‑year, entry‑point measures that will be monitored as the year progresses and intervention plans are developed.
Kelly also reported operational metrics: the district has conducted 184 professional learning community (PLC) meetings between Sept. 9 and Oct. 10, and said staff performed 529 walkthroughs in the past month for a total of 733 walkthroughs to date (districtwide). The presentation described roughly 367 intervention plans started in the Branching Minds system.
Board members asked for month‑to‑month overlays and more contextualization of how beginning‑of‑year screening relates to final proficiency outcomes; Kelly agreed to add comparative month‑to‑month charts to future updates and said the district will provide more detailed cross‑walks between formative measures and state exams.
Ending
District leaders said they will return each month with updated check‑in data and more detailed analyses showing movement across tiers as interventions are implemented.
(Note: numbers reported are early‑year measures presented by district staff and reflect initial screeners and check‑in data rather than final state proficiency results.)
