Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee recommends ITL on Senate Bill 123-FN after debate over cost, evidence for acupuncture

October 23, 2025 | Judiciary, Senate , Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee recommends ITL on Senate Bill 123-FN after debate over cost, evidence for acupuncture
Members of the Judiciary Committee moved and approved a recommendation of "inexpedient to legislate" on Senate Bill 123-FN after a short discussion focused on projected costs and the available evidence for auricular acupuncture as a Medicaid-covered treatment.

The motion to recommend ITL was made by Senator Birdsall and seconded by Senator Rosenwald. Committee discussion raised concern about the fiscal impact and the strength of evidence supporting the bill’s proposal to expand Medicaid coverage to include auricular acupuncture.

A committee member said the committee faces significant budget pressures, noting a cited $50 million back-end budget cut in Health and Human Services, an additional $17 million to $20 million in delayed revenue, and that current-month revenue collections were "coming in, like, 30 something million behind," plus a referenced $10 million expenditure to the attorney general and defense. The member said testimony estimated the proposal would cost between $1 million and $5 million and indicated that, on balance, they supported the ITL motion.

A committee speaker who identified having consulted clinical review wrote that the state does not cover acupuncture under Medicaid. That speaker said they asked Dr. Ballard to re-review the evidence for auricular acupuncture and that Dr. Ballard "determined that there is still no change in level of evidence. There is some limited evidence of its use, but not conclusive as an evidence based beneficial treatment that meets the Medicaid level of medical necessity." The speaker added, "So it wouldn't be my first choice of where to expand Medicaid."

One senator asked whether the bill would be better handled as an interim study given the presence of other senators with interest; another committee member said any interim study would be better placed in the Health and Human Services Committee because the bill already passed that committee and the current discussion centered on fiscal impacts.

With no further discussion, the committee proceeded to a voice vote. The chair called for ayes and nays; the motion to recommend ITL carried by voice vote. The transcript does not record individual roll-call votes or numeric tallies.

The committee took up a consent calendar after the ITL motion; committee members approved the consent items by voice vote and then adjourned.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI