Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Parking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards several parking and one‑way traffic petitions to full council or DPW for further review

6440339 · October 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members forwarded several parking and traffic petitions on Oct. 14, including an amended no‑parking proposal on Irving Ave and multiple one‑way and resident‑parking items sent to DPW or the city engineer for review.

The Ordinance Committee on Oct. 14 considered a range of parking and traffic petitions and took a mix of actions: forwarding some items to the full City Council with favorable recommendation for a public hearing, and tabling or advancing other items pending additional input from the Department of Public Works or the city engineer.

Key outcomes:

- Irving Ave (Document 38025): The committee amended the proposed restriction to 6 p.m.–7 a.m. (police recommendation initially showed 6 p.m.), accepted the amendment, and sent the item to the full council with a favorable recommendation to schedule a public hearing.

- Hillside Avenue / Ames Street one‑way petitions (Documents 37525 and related): The Police Department recommended the changes but the committee asked for DPW/city‑engineer review before sending to full council; the motion forwarded the items pending DPW documentation and asked staff to send correspondence to the city engineer.

- Handicap removal / no‑parking at 5 Durant Street (Document 38725): Committee members noted incomplete worksheet documentation and voted to send correspondence to Councilor Luzon asking for clarification; the item was tabled pending further explanation from the councilor and a police follow‑up.

Several additional resident parking and handicap parking requests were grouped and sent to the police department and the city engineer for review; the committee agreed to process those as blocks as shown on the agenda.

Votes on the record were roll calls and committee decisions were unanimous for the motions described above.