Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District reviews state test results and English-learner reclassification rates; modest gains reported
Summary
Alisal Union staff walked parents through recent state assessment results and English‑learner progress measures, reporting small changes in proficiency rates and a slight increase in reclassification percentages for English learners.
Get email alerts on the State Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alisal Union School District staff reviewed district results from the most recent state assessments and explained reclassification criteria for students learning English, noting modest changes in proficiency and reclassification rates.
The briefing matters because assessment results inform school planning, teacher supports and parent discussions about interventions for students who are not meeting grade-level expectations.
A presenter prefaced the assessment segment as the annual review of summative assessments for students in grades three through six and English‑learner monitoring. She described the measures used: a district reading/language arts measure, mathematics and science results, and the English‑language proficiency assessment used to track progress and reclassification.
Staff reported district percentages comparing two years: proficiency in language arts remained nearly flat (reported as 28.7% to 28.6%), mathematics rose “a little” (reported from 20% to about 21%), and science improved from about 10.8% to 15.8%. For English‑learner reclassification, presenters said district reclassification rose from roughly 9% to approximately 10.6% year over year.
Presenters explained reclassification is based on a combination of the state proficiency measure and local district assessments; students meeting both state and district criteria may be reclassified out of English‑learner status. The presentation described supports to increase reclassification: targeted instruction, small-group interventions, after‑school programs and teacher training. A presenter said many students remain at intermediate levels (level 3) and that moving those students forward is a priority for classroom instruction and supplemental programming.
Parents were invited to review school-level breakdowns (percentages and student counts by school) and to follow up with school principals for campus-specific discussions about supports.
District staff did not announce new districtwide programs at this meeting but said they will continue a mixture of in-school interventions and after-school supports to raise proficiency and reclassification rates.

