Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Chronic Absenteeism topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alisal Union coordinators warn chronic absenteeism at 14.7%; district outlines supports and thresholds
Summary
Coordinators and school staff presented district chronic absenteeism data (14.7% in 2023–24), explained how absenteeism is defined and tracked, and described a tiered support system that escalates interventions as absences increase.
Alisal Union School District community-school coordinators presented data and strategies aimed at lowering chronic student absenteeism, reporting a district chronic-absence rate of 14.7% for 2023–24 and outlining a stepped system of supports for students who miss school.
The issue matters because presenters said chronic absenteeism—absences for any reason, including excused absences and suspensions—correlates with lower academic outcomes and higher dropout risk.
Daniel Sánchez, community school coordinator at Monte Bella, opened the presentation and described the program’s role in each school. Sánchez said the coordinator team’s work is funded through a grant and focuses on attendance, school climate and achievement. "Hoy estamos aquí para presentar la importancia del de la asistencia estudiantil," he said.
Presenter Isaura explained the district definition and examples used in the presentation: missing an average of two days a month across a school year is substantial and, over time, can represent a significant loss of instruction. She summarized the instructional impact with examples used in the slide deck: two absences per month in preschool through fifth grade can amount to about six months of lost learning over the primary years; across kindergarten through grade 12, that pattern can add up to more than a year of lost instruction. Isaura also said the district considers suspensions in chronic‑absence counts and distinguishes unjustified absences (no call or note) as a separate disciplinary concern linked to legal obligations at the state level.
Presenters gave numerical guidance for families: they said missing more than nine school days per year is likely to harm a student’s learning and asked parents to keep absences below that threshold when possible. The presentation said tardies are tracked separately and are not included in the chronic-absence percentage the state reports.
The district reported that the state’s recommended benchmark is 10% chronic absence and said Alisal Union’s 14.7% is above that figure for 2023–24. Presenters offered school-based interventions (attendance teams, targeted small-group academic supports, home‑school outreach) and district-level review (district attendance review meetings and a partnership option with the district attorney’s office for severe cases). They described a stepped “traffic light” approach: light supports for families with up to nine absences, escalating to more intensive supports and referrals as absences increase beyond 10 and 18 days.
Staff asked parents to report student absences to the school within the time window required by district policy so attendance staff can record reasons and submit monthly state data. (Presenters stated a 72‑hour reporting window; a later phrase in the presentation included a different number that was unclear in the recording.)
Parents had the opportunity to ask school-specific questions after the presentation; coordinators said they will remain available after the meeting to discuss individual situations.
