Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Business License Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mobile council delays vote on revoking 16 O 8 business license; public commenters urge caution
Summary
A proposed revocation of the business license for 16 O 8 at 1608 Saint Stephens Road was introduced Oct. 21 but the City Council voted to lay the item over for one week while requesting more data about calls for service and prior enforcement history.
The Mobile City Council on Oct. 21 laid over for one week a proposed revocation of the business license for 16 O 8 (also referenced in the meeting transcript as Fat Tuesdays), after council members asked the administration for additional data and time to review enforcement history.
The item (agenda reference 371346) was introduced and a motion to revoke the license was made, but during discussion a council member said she was not ready to vote and asked that the matter be held for one week to allow staff to provide further information. The council approved the layover motion; the item will return for a final decision at the next regular council meeting.
Public comment at the meeting included a statement from Lakisha Clemons, who identified herself as an employee of Fat Tuesdays (16 O 8). Clemons described the owner, Richard Johnson, as a community supporter who funds holiday meals and youth events and who provides work and support for employees. "There are not many Black establishments that give back to the minority community, but I have seen firsthand how many people Richard Johnson has given back to," Clemons said.
Council members seeking more information asked the administration for a detailed "bell-curve" analysis of calls for service—what times and types of calls occurred and where they were concentrated—as well as past enforcement actions at 16 O 8 and comparisons to other establishments that have faced license-revocation proceedings. One council member specifically asked for records about whether off-duty police worked third-party contracts using city vehicles, and for clarification about how that arrangement is administered and monitored.
Council members said they were reluctant to immediately revoke a business license without fuller information, noting the potential livelihood impacts on employees. The council did not vote to revoke the license on Oct. 21; the item was laid over for one week with instructions that administration produce the requested materials before the next hearing.
