Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reserves And Savings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
JFAC hears status of stabilization and education reserve funds; budget‑stabilization account nears statutory cap
Summary
Legislative staff described the balances in the budget stabilization and public education stabilization funds and how transfers and statutory caps affect how much cash the state can hold.
Get email alerts on the Reserves And Savings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers received a walkthrough of Idaho’s rainy‑day and education reserve accounts and how recent transfers and revenue changes affect the state’s capacity to respond to a downturn.
Keith Bybee told the Joint Finance‑Appropriations Committee that the governor’s FY2026 recommendation would add about $59 million to the Budget Stabilization Fund, bringing it close to $939 million — near the statutory 15 percent cap on that fund if revenues meet current projections. Bybee noted the legislature temporarily suspended the cap last year to avoid automatic transfers back to the general fund and to keep money in savings rather than bouncing it between accounts.
He also described the Public Education Stabilization Fund (PSIF) as an overdraft mechanism that smooths public‑school support payments when support units and related funding differ from budget assumptions. Under the governor’s forecast the PSIF balance would rise to about $293.6 million, also approaching its statutory cap tied to total public‑school support funding.
Why it matters: the balances in both funds change how the state can respond to economic stress and affect the size of the general fund available for spending or transfers. Committee members remarked that the state’s current savings position is large compared with the last major downturn in 2009, when reserves and cuts were much deeper.
Questions from members focused on historical decisions and policy tradeoffs. Senator Wintrow and others noted bond rating agency guidance and prior committee discussions recommending higher caps; Representative Bybee and colleagues emphasized the bookkeeping and statutory mechanics that determine whether money automatically stays in savings or reverts to the general fund.
Next steps
Committee members asked staff for detailed follow‑up on past transfers into the governor’s emergency fund and for continuing transparency on how transfers interact with statutory caps and reserve balances. Staff said they would provide follow‑up detail in later materials.
