Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Algorithmic Price Fixing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rep. Achilles introduces RS32044C1 to target algorithmic price‑fixing in rental market
Summary
Representative Todd Achilles introduced RS32044C1 to the House State Affairs Committee to clarify that sharing confidential pricing data with third‑party service providers that produce coordinated pricing recommendations can constitute illegal price fixing; the committee voted to introduce the request statement for printing and a future hearing.
Representative Todd Achilles, R‑District 16, told the House State Affairs Committee that RS32044C1 is intended to update Idaho’s antitrust framework to address third‑party data sharing and algorithmic price coordination in rental housing markets.
"We all want free markets, and competitive markets and so this RS in front of you is intended to fix a growing problem in markets where companies are sharing data and using that data to price fix," Achilles said, describing what he called a "hub and spoke" pattern in which competing landlords supply confidential data to a shared service provider that then produces pricing recommendations across those customers.
The proposal, Achilles said, responds to rent increases reported by constituents in Boise and Coeur d'Alene and echoes recent enforcement actions by attorneys general in other states. "Where the urgency is is actually in the rental housing market," Achilles said, noting complaints and litigation in Tennessee, North Carolina, Georgia and Arizona that involve firms operating in Idaho markets.
Why it matters: Committee members flagged enforcement and scope questions. Representative Barbieri asked how the draft would distinguish covered third‑party services from sales listing or advertising platforms. Representative Dygert asked Achilles to bring details on enforcement feasibility, noting concerns about data stored "in the cloud" or on servers outside state reach.
Procedural action: Representative Alfieri moved to introduce RS32044C1 for printing and a future hearing. The chair put the question, and the motion to introduce the RS was carried.
What’s next: RS32044C1 was printed for a subsequent hearing; Achilles indicated he will appear again with additional detail and declined to expand until the committee directed printing.
Ending: The introduction places the issue on the committee calendar for a full hearing at which members requested additional information about how the bill would differentiate covered services from ordinary listing tools and how enforcement would work in practice.
